Your license and your criminal case are two separate fights. The license fight has a hard deadline that does not care how you feel tonight: 7 days, in writing, after you receive the notice of revocation.
Figures follow current Colorado statute text, checked September 26, 2026.
Colorado's statute is exact: "A person must request a hearing in writing within seven days after the day the person receives the notice of revocation" (C.R.S. § 42-2-126(7)(a)). Most people receive that notice on the same day as the arrest, served by the officer — but the legal clock is tied to when you receive the notice, not the arrest date on the calendar.
Miss the window, and the revocation becomes final with no hearing. A late request is possible only with a verified statement showing you did not actually get notice, or were physically unable to act — for example, hospitalized or incarcerated — and even then, no stay is granted while that claim is being decided (§ 42-2-126(7)(b), (c)).
Five steps, one clock that starts the moment you receive the notice
You receive the notice of revocation. The 7-day clock starts the day you receive it.
The 7 days runs from the day you receive the notice, in writing (C.R.S. § 42-2-126(7)(a)) — request in writing within that window.
A timely request stays the revocation; the Department of Revenue issues a permit valid until the hearing date (§ 42-2-126(7)(d)).
Before a DOR hearing officer, not a judge, who decides whether the revocation stands (§ 42-2-126(2)(f), (8)).
The revocation length follows the ladder for your case type; a successful challenge to the stop or arrest itself can end it entirely.
The hearing is run by a Colorado Department of Revenue hearing officer — the DOR's executive director or someone the director designates — not a court and not a judge (C.R.S. § 42-2-126(2)(f); § 42-1-102(24)). It decides your driving privilege only, separate from any criminal case in county or district court.
The hearing officer considers all relevant evidence, including the officer's testimony (§ 42-2-126(8)(c)). If your BAC analysis is disputed and the lab result was 0.096 or more, the state gets a rebuttable presumption in its favor (§ 42-2-126(8)(e)(II)) — meaning it can still be challenged, just not from a neutral starting point. You can also challenge whether the initial stop and arrest were constitutionally and statutorily valid; if that challenge succeeds, you are not subject to revocation regardless of the BAC or refusal evidence (§ 42-2-126(8)(h), cross-referencing § 42-1-228).
Both go through the identical hearing procedure. What differs is the revocation length and which evidence applies — the BAC-analysis presumption above has no counterpart in a refusal case, since there is no chemical result to dispute.
At the department's discretion, all or part of the hearing can be conducted remotely, by telephone or other electronic means, and the law enforcement officer can likewise appear remotely (C.R.S. § 42-2-126(7)(d), (8)(b)).
Once a revocation is finalized — whether by default, because no hearing was requested in time, or by the hearing officer's written decision — early reinstatement with an ignition interlock is available for most revocations under current law. It is not yet a universal, automatic rule for every first offense; that changes for revocations on or after June 1, 2027 under HB26-1242.
The statute ties the 7 days to the day you actually receive the notice of revocation, not to the date of the arrest printed on your paperwork (C.R.S. § 42-2-126(7)(a)). Note that date as soon as the notice is in your hands.
The request itself has to be in writing (C.R.S. § 42-2-126(7)(a)) — a phone call or a verbal request at the scene does not satisfy the statute. We prepare and submit that written request for clients as soon as we are retained, precisely because the window is short and unforgiving.
If the revocation stands, either by default or by the hearing officer's written decision, reinstatement is not automatic once the revocation period ends. The director will not issue or reinstate a license after a revocation under C.R.S. §§ 42-2-125 or 42-2-126 until you file, and then maintain, SR-22 proof of financial responsibility for three years (C.R.S. §§ 42-7-406(1), 42-7-408(1)(b)).
If you were designated a persistent drunk driver — triggered by a BAC of 0.15 or more on a single offense, two or more alcohol-related driving violations, driving after a prior alcohol-related restraint, or a refusal (C.R.S. § 42-2-132.5) — reinstatement also requires completing Level II alcohol treatment and holding an interlock-restricted license for at least two years afterward, on top of the SR-22 requirement.
The DMV hearing is separate from the courthouse
The Express Consent hearing is a Colorado Department of Revenue administrative proceeding, not held at a courthouse. The criminal DUI or DWAI case itself, for an Arapahoe County arrest, is heard at the Arapahoe County Justice Center, 7325 S. Potomac Street, Centennial, CO 80112 — Arapahoe County Court for misdemeanors, Arapahoe County District Court for felonies, both in the 18th Judicial District.
The DMV hearing often turns on paperwork and machine records: the breath or blood test's calibration and result records, the officer's body-camera and dash-camera video of the stop and testing, and the exact timestamp on the notice of revocation itself. We request and review that record before the hearing date.
Learn about digital forensics at our firmStraight answers, with the statute they come from
This page is general information about Colorado law, not legal advice for your situation, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. The legal statements here were checked on September 26, 2026.
Once the deadline passes, the revocation is final with no hearing at all. The consultation is free.